In program evaluation, which group should be involved?

In program evaluation, which group should be involved?

• A. Data analysts only
• B. External consultants only
• C. Involving instructors and students
• D. Administrators only

Answer: (C)

In program evaluation, bringing in the people who experience and deliver the program—instructors and students—is essential. Instructors understand how the curriculum is put into practice, what barriers exist, and what outcomes are realistic to observe. Students provide direct insights into their learning experiences, engagement, and the effects of the program on them. This collaboration helps shape relevant evaluation questions, guides data collection, and makes findings more credible and actionable. Relying only on data analysts, external consultants, or administrators can miss on-the-ground perspectives and reduce buy-in, making recommendations harder to implement. Involving instructors and students yields results that are meaningful and usable for improvement.

In program evaluation, bringing in the people who experience and deliver the program—instructors and students—is essential. Instructors understand how the curriculum is put into practice, what barriers exist, and what outcomes are realistic to observe. Students provide direct insights into their learning experiences, engagement, and the effects of the program on them. This collaboration helps shape relevant evaluation questions, guides data collection, and makes findings more credible and actionable. Relying only on data analysts, external consultants, or administrators can miss on-the-ground perspectives and reduce buy-in, making recommendations harder to implement. Involving instructors and students yields results that are meaningful and usable for improvement.